MORMON CHURCH CANCELS PLANS TO 'EXCOMMUNICATE' FORMER MEMBER
July 17, 2000
San Francisco--A spokesperson for the North America West Area
of the Mormon (LDS) church sent a fax to the San Francisco Examiner
this morning to let the publication and reporter Carol Ness know
that a 'disciplinary council' that was scheduled to discuss the
membership of Owen Edwards of San Francisco has been cancelled.
The 'council' was apparently cancelled due to a front page story
this morning in the Examiner about the church 'excommunicating'
people who have formally resigned from the church. Edwards, a gay
man and former Mormon, was featured in the article because his bishop
had let him know excommunication proceedings had been scheduled
to be held on July 23, despite a formal letter of resignation that
Owens wrote to the church in late February.
Examiner reporter Ness called Edwards this morning to let him
know that she'd received the fax telling her that the 'council'
to discuss Edward's 'membership' had been called off.
Edwards says he isn't necessarily thrilled that the council has
been called off, "because it only means they won't harass ME
due to my resignation. What about other people who send in their
resignations? Will they be forced to call the media when the church
threatens to excommunicate them in response to their resignations?
When will the church stop this harassment?"
The public press appears to be a bigger concern than the welfare
of, at least some of, the members.
The writings below are all from the emails I [rpcman]
received...
On Friday, Carol Ness of the SF Examiner called me regarding this
guy who is gay and wants to leave the church. Today, her story
ran on the front page of the paper. After the story hit, a
"spokesman" for the North America West Area Presidency
faxed a letter to Carol Ness (author), saying that the DC has been
cancelled. I find it extremely intersting that the church essentially
backed down AFTER the sh** hit the fan, AND that the cancellation
message was sent NOT to the man himself, but to the EXAMINER. They
obviously want to send a PUBLIC message that they have cancelled
the exing. I also find it significant that the fax came, NOT
from church PR, either local or general, but from the NAWest Area
Presidenty.
xxxxxx
------------
Subj: In the SF Examiner today
Date: 7/17/2000 5:53:23 PM Mountain Daylight Time
Leaving Mormon Church difficult
By Carol Ness OF THE EXAMINER STAFF
July 17, 2000
Joining the Mormon Church is easy. Getting out can be hell.
So says Owen Edwards, a 28-year-old San Francisco masseur and
student aesthetician.
Born into the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, Edwards
faces a disciplinary hearing and possible excommunication for submitting
his resignation, explaining his reasons and asking to have his name
removed from the Mormon Church's membership records.
That was 41/2 months ago - and some 13 years since he had stopped
attending church. Edwards charges he is being kept against his will
in a church that doesn't even want him because he is gay.
"I just feel like this is very hurtful to me - that I can't
just walk away. I have to fight tooth and nail," Edwards said.
"I personally believe the Mormon Church is a vindictive bunch
of cult members," he added.
Edwards believes he faces a disciplinary hearing because, in his
resignation letter, he said he was gay, had a partner and wanted
his name removed because of the church's all-out campaign for Proposition
22, the Knight Initiative against legal gay marriage that Californians
passed last year. The Mormon Church considers having gay sex, like
murder, grounds for excommunication.
Bishop Bryan Earl's letter informing Edwards that he faced possible
excommunication said only that it was "because of information
contained in your letter."
The Mormon Church's Bay Area spokesman, Jay Pimentel of Alameda,
said he could not comment on Edwards' case because it's confidential.
Edwards is far from alone. Quitting the Mormon Church has long
been difficult. Excommunication was the only way to sever ties until
the 1980s, when a lawsuit forced the church to allow members to
have their names stricken from membership rolls.
But in many cases, so-called name removal
can wind up taking months or years, require repeated letters and
inquiries, and prompt persistent and ongoing visits and calls from
fellow Mormons that, some ex-Mormons say, approach harassment and
invasion of privacy.
In some cases, like Edwards', disciplinary hearings are called.
Members are investigated, their families and acquaintances are questioned,
and any transgression and its punishment can be announced by church
leaders.
Members like Edwards who are gay appear especially vulnerable
to discipline and excommunication when they try to leave - although
the evidence is anecdotal.
The church's campaign for Prop. 22 prompted a spate of resignations,
including Edwards'. Since then, at least 300 Mormons have contacted
Kathy Worthington, an ex-Mormon activist in Utah who helps members
navigate the name-removal process.
At least three, all of them gay, have been excommunicated.
How many people resign yearly, or try to, is impossible to assess.
Through Pimentel, the church declined to provide statistics on name-removal
requests - how many are submitted, if that number is growing, how
many end up in disciplinary hearings or lead to excommunication
- or explain why. A call to the membership records director at church
headquarters in Salt Lake City was not returned.
Pimentel said name removals are handled locally and each case
is different. He denied that the church can try to make it hard
for people to leave.
Members who write letters seeking to resign will be contacted
by church leaders to make sure they're not being pressured, and
that they understand the consequences for their souls, he said.
If there is a suspicion that the member has committed some transgression,
however, disciplinary hearings can be called. Such transgressions
include criminal behavior and sex out of marriage.
Pimentel was not sure if homosexuality, without proof of sexual
activity, was enough to trigger a hearing. The Mormon Church, like
many mainstream Christian churches, considers homosexuality immoral
but retains gay members if they are chaste and seek to change.
The three excommunications this year, however, suggest a different
story.
Forty-eight-year-old Loyd Bulkley of Murray, Utah, was raised
in the church, married and raised his four children as Mormons and
then divorced. He came out of the closet nine years ago.
He stopped going to church, except for special occasions involving
his children. Church leaders challenged him once, and he told them
to get lost.
But after a spat with his most devout son, he decided to quit.
His letter didn't say he was gay, and asked that he not be contacted.
"Then I get a letter saying, "We have heard from reliable
sources that you are homosexual. We can't just let you resign. We
have to have a disciplinary court,' " Bulkley recalled. His
hearing was June 15, held before 15 assembled church leaders.
"Twelve men in a high council and three stake presidents
- to kick out one gay man who wants to be out. I felt like one letter
should have done it," he said.
He was excommunicated, although the church had no evidence of
sexual activity. Family members who had not known he was gay have
cut off contact with him as a result, he said.
If you don't take your name off, he said, "you can quit going
and they can harass and torment you, they send teachers over and
people to visit you and call you and invite you to functions. They
want you back into the church.
"It's never really your choice," he added. "Then
if you do something wrong they'll kick you out."
Two Cedar City, Utah, women in their 30s tell a similar story.
Both raised in the Mormon church, they fell in love. Once they moved
in together, the church started sending visiting teachers, to spy,
one of the women thinks.
Earlier this year they wrote separate letters of resignation,
saying they disagreed with church policies and involvement in politics.
Then their bishop showed up, trembling, to ask if "what we've
heard is true," the woman related. They were excommunicated.
"They took away our power to decide what we want to do,"
she said. Her partner's family was devastated, she said. Her cousins
stopped talking to her.
All three have talked about trying to sue the church.
Worthington has been trying to get a class-action lawsuit together,
but said Utah laws aren't conducive. She's hoping Edwards will sue
in California, which has explicit privacy guarantees.
He's seeking a lawyer, but churches have proved fairly immune
to litigation over their treatment of members.
Like most Mormons, Edwards was born into the church. He was baptized
at age 8 - before he was old enough to make such a decision for
himself.
When he was 13, he realized he was gay and decided he was OK,
no matter what his church thought.
He's had almost nothing to do with the church since he was 15,
when he left his mother's Utah home for his father's in Southern
California.
Since 1997, he's lived in San Francisco, now with his partner
in the Tenderloin. He's a licensed masseur and attends Miss Marty's
beauty school on Mission Street to get his spa certification.
He never before sought to quit the church because he didn't want
to have to tell his mother, for whom Mormonism is vital. But activism
by people like Worthington over the church's Prop. 22 campaign galvanized
him to write his letter.
He doesn't intend to go to his hearing next week and he expects
it to result in excommunication.
He didn't intend to try to take the church on in court, but its
refusal to let him quit has sparked the fight in him.
The spiritual effect of excommunication is, to Edwards, the same
as if he were just allowed to quit. But it is a black mark against
him with other people, who because of the process will find out
he is gay, he said.
"This is the first time I have ever spoken out against the
church directly," he said, "because in my opinion they
are attacking me directly and I have no choice."
|