What Are Adam-God Teachings?
Adam-God theory/ teachings/doctrine are names given to an alleged
teaching by Brigham Young, the second president and prophet of the
Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (hereafter called Mormons
or LDS). He allegedly taught that Adam of the Garden of Eden is
the Father of the spirit of Jesus Christ, is the Father of our spirits,
is the literal father of the body of Jesus Christ, and is our God,
i.e., God the Father. It is also alleged that the fourth and fifth
Presidents and Prophets Wilford Woodruff and Joseph F. Smith, supported
this teaching.
Adam-God is not now taught by the Mormon Church and the twelfth
Mormon President and Prophet Spencer W. Kimball, denounced it strongly
in 1976 when he said:
We warn you against the dissemination of doctrine which are not
according to the scriptures and which are alleged to have been
taught by some of the General Authorities of past generations.
Such, for instance is the Adam-God theory.
We denounce that theory and hope that everyone will be cautioned
against this and other kinds of false doctrine. (1) (Deseret
News, Church News Section, p. 11, Oct. 9, 1976)
Is President Kimball correct that it was "alleged to have
been taught by some of the General Authorities of past generations?"
Was it false doctrine according to Brigham Young and others?
These questions will be answered below.
What Mormons Say
Some Mormons know little or nothing about the Adam-God teachings
of Brigham Young. Some say the Adam-God charge is made because of
one talk by Brigham Young as recorded in Journal of Discourses
1:50-51, April 9, 1852. They go on to say this talk is an isolated
example, is not clear and may have been recorded incorrectly. There
is strong evidence that these ideas are wrong.
Formal Vote Always Needed?
Some Mormons know Adam-God was taught, but say it was never accepted
by a vote of the Mormon Church membership (D&C 26:2, 28:13,
104:21 - "all things shall be done by common consent in the
Church..."), hence is not church doctrine. Because there was
no vote Adam-God teachings were just Brigham Young's personal
opinion and not official doctrine. But those who say this must
not be aware of the many examples where the lack of a revelation
and/or vote did not stop the practice/teaching of other unique Mormon
Church doctrine. Examples are:
- The practice of polygamy by Mormon Church leaders from roughly
1835-1880 took place without a Mormon Church membership vote.
And during part of this time there was not even an un-approved
revelation to fall back on. The alleged revelation (D&C 132)
to allow the practice of polygamy was written in 1843, well after
the start of the actual practice. It was first publicly announced
August 29, 1852, (A Comprehensive History of the Church of
Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, 4:55, 56), but was not
put into Scriptures until 1876. This "revelation" along
with 26 or 27 others were not voted on until October 1880; (Ensign,
December 1984, pp 38, 39). Even while polygamy was being practiced,
through the full period of 1835-1876, Section 101, page 261 of
the 1835 Doctrine and Covenants condemned having more than one
living wife/husband at the same time.
- There is no accepted revelation that there is a Mother in Heaven,
i.e., God (Elohim) has a wife (Gospel Principles, page
9; Mormon hymn #270: "O My Father", LDS Hymns, 1973
edition).
- That Jesus Christ is "Jehovah" and "Elohim"
is God the Father (The Articles of Faith, by James E. Talmage,
Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, missionary edition,
pp 466, 467).
- That Jesus Christ was the first spirit child of God the Father
and his wife and was raised to maturity in the pre-existence (Gospel
Principles, p. 9).
- That Jesus Christ and Lucifer are spirit brothers (Gospel
Through the Ages, Milton R. Hunter, page 15).
- That God the Father was once a man like us and progressed to
become God (Search These Commandments, Melchizedek Priesthood
Study Guide, 1985 pages 151-153).
- The very sacred Mormon Temple ceremonies are not in any Mormon
Scripture. The April 1990 changes in the temple ceremonies attest
to the fact that these very sacred temple ordinances are not governed
by "common consent."
- Most Mormons, when asked about the references in the Book of
Mormon that say there is only one God (The Testimony of
Three Witnesses in the front of the Book of Mormon; Alma 11:28,
29, 44; Mormon 7:7), usually say: "Well that means one
in purpose." There is no Mormon canonized scripture that
says one in purpose.
Note that all the references used in the above eight items are
published by the Mormon Church.
How Important Is It To Know God?
Brigham Young said:
It is one of the first principles of the doctrine of salvation
to become acquainted with our Father and our God. (Journal
of Discourses, 4:215, Feb. 8, 1857)
Brigham Young then quotes from John 17:3 about knowing the only
true God and Jesus whom he sent. He then says,
...this is as much to say that no man can enjoy or be prepared
for eternal life without that knowledge.
Joseph Smith agreed when he said:
It is the first principle of the Gospel to know for a certainty
the Character of God.... (Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith,
page 345; HC 6:305; Journal of Discourses 6:3).
He also said,
...three things are necessary, in order that any rational and
intelligent being may exercise faith in God unto life and salvation...Secondly,
A correct idea of his character, perfections and attributes.
(Lecture Third of Faith, 1835 Doctrine and Covenants, page 36,
verses 2-4)
Is it important to know the character, perfections and attributes
of God? It certainly is according to Brigham Young and Joseph Smith.
Now let us look at what Brigham Young said we should know about
God.
Adam-God Taught, Called Doctrine and Revelation
Mormons who say Adam-God doctrine was not taught must not be aware
of the following.
How much unbelief exists in the minds of Latter-day Saints in
regard to one particular doctrine which I revealed to them,
and which God revealed to me - namely that Adam is our
father and God ..Then he said, 'I want my children who are
in the spirit world to come and live here. I once dwelt upon an
earth something like this, in a mortal state. I was faithful.
I received my crown and exaltation...I want my children that
were born to me in the spirit world to come here and take
tabernacles of flesh that their spirits may have a house, a tabernacle...'
(Brigham Young, Deseret Weekly News, June 18, 1873, page
308; Deseret Evening News, June 14, 1873)
Who was the Savior begotten by?....Who did beget him?
His Father, and his father is our God, and the Father of our spirits,
and he is the framer of the body, the God and Father of our Lord
Jesus Christ. Who is he? He is Father Adam; Michael; the Ancient
of Days. (President Brigham Young, Feb. 19, 1854, Brigham
Young Collection, LDS Archives; ; Brigham Young Addresses,
1850-1854, Vol. 2, by Elden J. Watson, sheet 179 (in chronological
order), Historical Dept. Church, Ms d 1234, Box 48 Fd. 11; also
in Adam Is God???, pp. 9-10; Adam-God Maze, p.101)
Some have grumbled because I believe our God to be so near
to us as Father Adam. There are many who know that doctrine
to be true. (Brigham Young, October 7, 1857, Journal of Discourses
5:331).
Some years ago I advanced a doctrine with regard to Adam
being our Father and God...It is one of the most glorious
revealments of the economy of heaven... (President Brigham Young,
in the Tabernacle, General Conference, October 8, 1861, 10:30
a.m.; Brigham Young Addresses, 1860-1864, Vol. 4, by Elden
J. Watson, sheet 134 (in chronological order), Historical Dept.
Church, Ms d 1234, Box 49 fd 8)
I tell you more: Adam is the father of our spirits. He
lived upon an earth, he did abide his creation and did honor to
his calling and priesthood and obeyed his master or lord, and
probably many of his wives did the same, and they lived and died
upon an earth and then were resurrected again to immortality
and eternal life. (Brigham Young, October 8, 1854, Brigham
Young Addresses, 18509-1854, Vol. 2, by Elden J. Watson, sheet
221 (in chronological order), Historical Dept. Church, Box 49
fd 12)
The following is that part of the Lecture at the Veil which was
delivered by President Young at his home in St. George, Utah, on
the evening of February 7th, 1877:...
16. Adam was an immortal being when he came on this earth;
17. He had lived on an earth similiar [sic] to ours; he
had received the Priesthood and the keys thereof,
18. And had been faithful in all things and gained his resurrection
and his exaltation, and was crowned with glory, immortality and
eternal lives, and was numbered with the Gods for such he
became through his faithfulness,
19.And had begotten all the spirits that was to come to this
earth. (Unpublished Revelations of the Prophets and
Presidents of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints,
complied by Fred C. Collier, Vol 1, pp. 116-117, Collier's Publishing
Co. P.O. Box 1866, Salt Lake City, UT 84110, 2nd edition 1981)
It is reported that this part of the Lecture was removed some
time between 1902 and 1905. This next quotation, by Brigham Young,
is the one many LDS say is not clear and/or not recorded correctly.
But notice, it is just one of many that say the same thing. Are
they all recorded incorrectly?
Now hear it, O inhabitants of the earth, Jew and Gentile, Saint
and sinner! When our father Adam came into the garden of Eden,
he came into it with a celestial body [see footnote 2 for
more on celestial body.], and brought Eve, one of his wives,
with him. He helped to make and organize this world. He is MICHAEL,
the Archangel, the ANCIENT OF DAYS! about whom holy men have written
and spokenHE is our FATHER and our GOD, and the
only God with whom WE have to do. Every man upon the earth,
professing Christians or nonprofessing, must hear it, and
will know it sooner or later... Now, let all who may hear these
doctrines, pause before they make light of them, or treat them
with indifference, for they will prove their salvation or damnation.
(Journal of Discourses, 1:5051, Brigham Young, April
9, 1852).
Brigham Young thought what he was talking about was very important,
note the words "will know it sooner or later" and
"will prove their salvation or damnation."
Adam Made From Dust of Another Earth
Consistent with Brigham Young's Adam-God teachings is his teaching
that Adam was made from the dust of another earth, not of this earth,
and came into the Garden of Eden with a celestial body.
You believe Adam was made of the dust of this earth. This
I do not believe, though it is supposed that it is so written
in the Bible; but it is not, to my understanding. You can write
that information to the States, if you please - that I have publicly
declared that I do not believe that portion of the Bible.... (President
Brigham Young, October 23, 1853, Journal of Discourses
2:6).
Adam was made from the dust of an earth, but not from the
dust of this earth. He was made as you and I are made, and
no person was ever made upon any other principle. (President Brigham
Young, April 20, 1856, Journal of Discourses 3:319).
Mankind are here because they are the offspring of parents
who were first brought here from another planet, and power
was given them to propagate their species...(Brigham Young, October
9, 1859, Journal of Discourses, 7:285286)
Adam, therefore, was resurrected by some one [sic]
who had been resurrected. (Brigham Young, Oct. 8, 1854; Brigham
Young Addresses, 1850-1854, Vol. 2, by Elden J. Watson, sheet
213 (in chronological order), Unpublished, Box 48 fd 12)
When our father Adam came into the Garden of Eden, he came
into it with a celestial body, and brought Eve, one
of his wives, with him. He helped to make and organize this
world. (Brigham Young, April 9, 1852. Journal of Discourses
1:50)
Some LDS think this last quotation is in error - perhaps recorded
incorrectly. What is evident is that this is the only reference
I could find in which Brigham Young explicitly states that Adam
came to this earth with a celestial body. However, he is
saying the same thing when he says, as shown above, that Adam had
gained his resurrection and exaltation, is the father of our spirits,
the father of the spirit of Jesus Christ and is God the Father.
Only resurrected exalted men can do this, those with celestial bodies
(Gospel Principles, p. 9, 290; 1986 or older editions; and
footnote 2 of this booklet).
The sampling of references above demonstrates that Brigham Young,
on many occasions, over 20 years, did teach Adam-God and he called
it doctrine and revelation. See page 15 of this booklet
for sources of more detailed examples.
Adam-God Doctrine Important?
Perhaps the following will help us understand why Brigham Young
did not teach Adam-God doctrine more often.
When we can see that very character [Michael/Ancient of Days
in context] and talk and live with him in our tabernacles, if
we are so fortunate as to get there into his society, then we
can say that to us there is but one living and true God, and
he is the father of our Lord Jesus Christ and of our spirits.
And when we get back to him and learn that he is actually our
father, we shall not feel any anxiety to call upon anybody else
for the blessings we are in need of. It is a subject I am aware
that does not appear so close to our understandings at present
as we could wish it or as it will be some day, and it is one
that should not trouble us at all, all such things will
become more clear to your minds bye and bye. I tell you this
as my belief about that personage who is called the Ancient of
Days [Adam] so on, but I do not tell it because that I wish
it established in the minds of others; though to me this is
as clear as the sun, it is as plain as my alphabet. I understand
it as I do the path to go home. I did not understand so until
my mind became enlightened with the spirit and by revelation
of God; neither will you understand until our Father in
Heaven reveals all things unto you. To my mind and to my feelings
those matters are all plain and easy to be understood. (Brigham
Young, April 25, 1855 at the Deseret Theological Institute; Church
Archives/Manuscript Addresses of Brigham Young; Brigham Young
Addresses, 1855-1859, Vol. 3; by Elden J. Watson; sheet 12
(in chronological order); The Adam-God Maze, p. 110)
Note how BrighamYoung said that God would reveal it to the listener
"bye and bye." This is why he said, "should not trouble
us at all," it was up to God and it would be revealed soon!
Adam-God doctrine was very important to Brigham Young and he expected
it to "become more clear to your minds bye and bye....until
our Father in Heaven reveals all things unto you."
Did Brigham Young Teach Normal LDS Doctrine About God?
Some Mormons use comments from Mormon Apostle John A. Widtsoe.
He admonishes the anti-Mormons for using "only a half dozen
statements" in support of Adam-God teachings and for ignoring
the hundreds that seemed to teach "the true nature of both
God our Heavenly Father and Adam." The source of this quotation
usually is Widtsoe's book, Evidences and Reconciliations,
1987 edition. What is missed is that Apostle Widtsoe died in 1952
and first made his statements about Adam-God in the 1943 edition
of his book, pages 287-290. A great deal more about Adam-God has
been made public since 1943, more than 50 years ago.
On page 289 of his 1943 book Apostle Widtsoe provides several
statements by Brigham Young which he thinks show how Brigham Young
did teach correct doctrine about the Father. These quotations are
as follows:
I believe the Father came down from heaven, as the Apostles said
he did, and begat the Savior of the World; for He is the Only
Begotten of the Father, which could not have been if the Father
did not actually beget him in person. (Journal of Discourses
1:238)
And what shall we say of our Heavenly Father: He is also a man
in perfection, and the Father of the man Jesus Christ, and the
Father of our spirits. (Journal of Discourses 2:42) [correction
- this quote is really found at 11:42. The 2:42 is an error by
Widtsoe.]
These statements do not contradict or nullify the very many clear
statements by Brigham Young that Adam is the father of our spirits
and the literal father of Jesus Christ. They easily fit within the
statements where Young did say that Adam is Heavenly Father.
What Did Other LDS Leaders Say About Adam-God
The following two items were said at a special general council
meeting in London, England:
Concerning the item of doctrine alluded to by Elder Caffall and
others, viz., that Adam is our Father and God, I have to
say do not trouble yourselves...If, as Elder Caffall remarked,
there are those who are waiting at the door of the Church for
this objection to be removed, tell such, the Prophet and
Apostle Brigham has declared it, and that it is the word of the
Lord. (Millennial Star, Vol. 16, Saturday, August
26, 1854, President F.D. Richards, page 334)
...some of the officers have not met in council for three years.
They are lacking faith on one principle - the last "cat that
was let out of the bag." Polygamy has been got over pretty
well, that cloud has vanished away, but they are troubled about
Adam being our Father and God. There is a very intelligent
person investigating our principles, and who has been a great
help to the Saints; he has all the works, and can get along very
well with everything else but the last "cat,"and as
soon as he can see that clearly, he will become a "Mormon."
I instructed him to write to Liverpool upon it...Relative to the
principles recently revealed [this last word is not clear], we
have not the least difficulty. If Adam's being our Father and
God cannot be proved by the Bible, it is all right. (Millennial
Star, Vol. 16, Saturday, August 5, 1854, pp. 482-483)
LDS Adam-God Opposition - Disciplinary Action
Disciplinary activity was held at high levels in the church for
those who did not agree with Adam-God doctrine. Two examples are:
- Orson Pratt, an apostle, was almost excommunicated for opposing
Adam-God Doctrine. Details are covered in Minutes of Meeting of
Council of the Twelve, Church Historian's Office; Brigham Young
Collection, Church Historian's office; details are found in Adam
Is God???, pp. 16-20.
- In late 1890 and 1891-1892, Bishop Edward Bunker, Jr. and his
father, Edward Bunker Sr. (of Bunkerville, Utah) and his counselor
Myron Abbott, were before church courts. The Bunkers denied Adam-God
Doctrine; Abbott accepted it. The final High Council Court was
held June 11, 1892 and was attended by President Wilford Woodruff
and his first counselor, George Q Cannon. In summary, the Bunkers
had their hands slapped for advancing false doctrine and "indulging
in mysteries." Bunker Sr. was advised "to let these
things alone." Abbott, who supported Adam-God doctrine, was
cautioned to not become "puffed up in pride" over the
victory. See Adam-God Maze, pp. 215-238 for the sources
covering the above. Also found in Unpublished Revelations
of the Prophets and Presidents of the Church of Jesus Christ of
Latter-day Saints, Vol 1, pp. 168-175; and Adam-God, pp.
145-158.
What Some General Authorities Thought
Some LDS say: "Adam-God theory was not considered Church
doctrine by other General Authorities." The disciplinary cases
above refutes this statement. Three other examples are:
- A letter from President Joseph F. Smith to Bishop Edward Bunker
(who was anti-Adam-God), February 27, 1902; Adam-God Maze,
p. 236.
- "... the period will come when the people will be willing
to adopt Joseph Smith as their Prophet, Seer and Revelator and
God! But not the father of their spirits, for that was our father
Adam" (Journal of Wilford Woodruff, December 11, 1869;
Brigham Young Addresses, 1865-1869, Vol 5, by Elden J.
Watson, Feb. 1982, page 361).
- For several others see pages 114-118 in the Adam-God Maze.
Adam-God Doctrine Found In Journals
One way to test if the record keeping (transcription) during Brigham
Young's talks were accurate is to examine the journals kept by those
in attendance. What do they say? Here is one example of the several
that may be found in the major references given on page 15.
Sunday afternoon [Oct. 8, 1854]...There are Lords many and there
are Gods many, & the Father of our Spirits is the Father of
Jesus Christ: He is the Father of Jesus Christ, Spirit & Body
and he is the beginner of the bodies of all men...there have
always been an Adam and an Eve - the first man and woman, and
their oldest son is heir, and should be our Savior...Michael
had his body from the dust of the planet he was begotten on...died
and was resurrected ...When Jesus has completed his work, Adam
shall have a fulness... Adam & Eve had children in the spirit
- and their children married - brother & sister - then the
bodies followed...(Journal notes by Thomas D. Brown, from
Brigham Young's October 8, 1854 talk, Journal of The Southern
Indian Mission, Diary of Thomas D. Brown, edited by Juanita Brooks,
Utah State University Press, Western Text Society Number 4, Logan,
Utah, pp. 88-89)
Adam-God Doctrine Found In LDS Hymns and Poems
Some LDS hymns and poems of the mid-1800s also exhibited Adam-God
doctrine. Author Douglas Campbell in his article "Changes In
LDS Hymns: Implications and Opportunities," Dialogue,
A Journal of Mormon Thought, Vol. 28, #3, fall 1995, speaks about
a poem that was changed before inserting it into the 1927 hymnal.
On page 71 he says:
On 13 April 1861 the Latter-day Saints' Millennial Star published
a poem about Adam, "Sons of Michael," with the opening
lines: "Sons of Michael, he approaches!/ Rise; the Eternal
Father greet." Although the church
did not officially accept Young's teachings on this matter, the
idea died slowly The 1927 hymnal converted the 1861 poem
"Sons of Michael" to hymn 334. The line with Adam
as the Eternal Father was replaced by "Sons of Michael,
He approaches!/ Rise; the ancient Father greet."
The Adam-God Maze, page 118, has another example:
Adam-God Reflected through Mormon Hymns
Hymns, sung in praise to God, depict the degree of Adam-God
indoctrination. They also reveal the God to whom those praises
were being sung. "We Believe in Our God" appeared in
an 1856 British hymn book:
WE BELIEVE IN OUR GOD
We believe in our God, the Prince of his race,
The archangel Michael, the Ancient of Days
Our own Father Adam, earth's Lord as is plain,
Who'll counsel and fight for His children again.
We believe in His Son, Jesus Christ, who in love
To His brothers and sisters came down from above,
To die, to redeem them from death, and to teach
To mortals and spirits the gospel we preach.
More examples may be found in the books Adam-God 121-136
and The Adam-God Maze, pp. 118-120.
Adam-God Doctrine Is Found In LDS Scriptures
One last point to be made is that Brigham Young did not have to
submit Adam-God teachings to a Mormon Church membership vote because
it was already in Mormon Scriptures!
And also with Michael or Adam, the father of all, the
prince of all, the ancient of days. (D&C 27:11, August
1830)
...Adam shall come to visit his people, or the Ancient
of Days shall sit, as spoken of by Daniel the prophet. (D&C
116, May 19, 1838)
A more recent "revelation" in D&C 138:38 says:
Among the great and mighty ones who were assembled in this vast
congregation of the righteous were Father Adam, the Ancient
of Days and father of all. (October 3,1918)
From these we learn:
- Adam/Michael is the Ancient of Days and the father referred
to by Daniel the prophet (see Daniel 7:9, 22 shown below).
- Adam is the father of all, the prince of all.
- Adam has the title Father - Father Adam (from the 1918 revelation)
From Daniel 7:9, 13, 14, 22 we find:
9 I beheld till the thrones were cast down, and the Ancient
of days did sit, whose garment was white as snow, and the
hair of his head like the pure wool: his throne was like
the fiery flame, and his wheels as burning fire.
13 I saw in the night visions, and, behold, one like the
Son of man came with the clouds of heaven, and came to
the Ancient of days, and they brought him near before him.
14 And there was given him dominion, and glory, and a kingdom,
that all people, nations, and languages, should serve him:
his dominion is an everlasting dominion, which shall not pass
away, and his kingdom that which shall not be destroyed.
22 Until the Ancient of days came, and judgment was given
to the saints of the most High; and the time came that the saints
possessed the kingdom.
From these and the Doctrine and Covenants references we have:
a. From Daniel 7:9: Father Adam has a throne (as does God the Father).
b. From Daniel 7:13-14- The "Son of Man," Jesus Christ
, will come to and will be brought before Father Adam and
Father Adam will give Jesus Christ dominion, and glory, and a Kingdom,
that all people, nations, and language, should serve him.(3) Only
God the Father would have the authority to do this.
Summary
It has been demonstrated that Brigham Young did teach Adam-God
doctrine over a 20 year period and in a variety of public meetings.
He obviously was expressing more than personal opinion as
it was taught at General Conference and other public meetings. He,
and others, called it doctrine and did not consider it a
theory, it was a revelation from God. He was not concerned
about its acceptance when he presented it because "...all such
things will be clear to your minds bye and bye" and "...neither
wi11 you understand until our Father in Heaven reveals all things
unto you." (April 25, 1855 talk ) It was shown that other General
Authorities of the Mormon Church accepted Adam-God doctrine.
Both Brigham Young and Joseph Smith said the first principle of
the Gospel and doctrine of salvation was to become acquainted with
our Father and God, and to know for a certainty his character, perfections
and attributes. It was then, and still is important to know if Adam
is God. It was also shown that disciplinary activity was taken at
a high level in the Mormon Church against lower level leaders that
rejected Adam-God doctrine.
Conclusions
Brigham Young and those who followed his Adam-God doctrine could
not have "faith in God unto life and salvation." They
were in gross error about the "character, perfections and attributes
of God." They violated the first principle taught by Joseph
Smith (see page 4 of this booklet, "How Important Is It To
Know God?")
Because of this Brigham Young must have become a fallen prophet
(if he was ever a prophet). In this fallen and apostate condition
he could not possibly have any priesthood authority to use and to
hand on to others. The priesthood can only be exercised with righteousness.
The same idea applies to all those who accepted Adam-God doctrine.
Can you think of a sin that God hates more than breaking the first
commandment (Exodus 20:3).
Apostle John A. Widtsoe said it this way:
Loss by Incorrect Living. The Priesthood is received by
man, but the use of it determines whether it remains with him.
The right to use it vanishes under the cloud of unrighteous
living, for nothing so grieves our Heavenly Father as to have
those who have received great knowledge, deny it and return
to untruth. (Priesthood and Church Government, p.66)
Then Apostle Wilford Woodruff, who became the fourth president
of the Mormon Church, had this to say:
...everlasting priesthood is bestowed...If we attempt to use
it for unrighteous purposes, like lightning from heaven, our
power, sooner or later, falls, and we fail to accomplish the designs
of God.-MS, 49:546, August, 1887. (The Discourses of Wilford
Woodruff, Edited by G. Homer Durham, Book Craft, Salt Lake
City, 1946, 1990, p.6970
A Mormon scripture says:
That the rights of the priesthood are inseparably connected with
the powers of heaven, and that the powers of heaven cannot be
controlled nor handled only upon the principles of righteousness...but
when we undertake to cover our sins, or to gratify our pride,
our vain ambition, or to exercise control or dominion or compulsion
upon the souls of the children of men, in any degree of unrighteousness,
behold, the heavens withdraw themselves; the Spirit of the Lord
is grieved; and when it is withdrawn, Amen to the priesthood or
the authority of that man. (Doctrine and Covenants 121:36-37)
Was Brigham Young unrighteous when he taught Adam-God and called
it doctrine and revelation? Mormon President Spencer W. Kimball
seemed to think so when he denounced the teaching and called it
false doctrine (see page 2 of this booklet for the quotation).
There is another consideration. If the top leaders of the Mormon
Church could make such a gross error with Adam-God doctrine then
all their teachings should be in question, such as those shown on
pages 5-6 of this booklet. Don't place your faith in a church or
a worldly man. There is only one person we all need, Jesus Christ
(1 Cor. 3:11, 15:22; Heb. 1:1-2; John 3:16; Rom. 10:9-11).
Detailed Adam-God References
- Adam-God, by Craig L. Tholson, Payson UT, Publishment,
1991, 378 pages.
- "Adam-God Doctrine, The"; by David John Buerger; Dialogue,
A Journal of Mormon Thought, Vol. 15, #1, Spring 1982, pages 14-58.
- Adam Is God???, booklet by Chris A. Vlachos, published
by Utah Lighthouse Ministries, Salt Lake City, 27 pages
- Adam-God Maze, by Culley K. Christensen, Independent
Publishers, 1981, 333 pages.
- Brigham Young Addresses, covering 1836-1869, 5 Vol.,
by Elden J. Watson; volumes 2-5 have Adam-God information.
- Michael Our Father And Our God, by Joseph W. Musser,
Truth Publishing Co., Salt Lake City, UT, 1963, 139 pages.
- Mormonism - Shadow or Reality, by Jerald and Sandra Tanner;
Salt Lake City, pp. 173-178-D.
- Notes, The, compiled by Robert R. Openshaw, The Bitterroot
Publishing Co., P.O. Box 1187 Hamilton, MT 59840. On pp. 1-61
218 sources on and related to Adam-God teachings are given in
summary.
- Unpublished Adam-God Discourses of Brigham Young, 1852-1877;
Doctrine of the Priesthood, September 1974, Vol. 2, No.1, Collier's
Publishing Co., 74 pages.
- Unpublished Revelations of the Prophets and Presidents
of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, complied by
Fred C. Collier, Vol 1, Collier's Publishing Co., P.O. Box 1866,
Salt Lake City, UT 84110, 2nd edition 1981.
Endnotes
- Bold face type and words in brackets in quotes are by this
author, John Farkas.
- Charles Penrose, an early LDS leader said: " Jesus Christ's
body was put in the sepulcher a natural body; it was raised a
spiritual body....it was in the fashion and likeness of the glorious
body of His Eternal Father. It was a celestial body quickened
by the celestial glory...." (November 16, 1884, Journal
of Discourses, 26:2223). Bruce R. McConkie in A New
Witness for the Articles of Faith said: "Truly baptism
prepares us for a glorious resurrection! 'For if we have been
planted together in the likeness of his [Christ's] death, we shall
be also in the likeness of his resurrection. (Rom. 6:3-6) As he
came forth in the resurrectin with a celestial body, a body free
from sin, a body prepared todwell everlastingly in a celestial
kingdom, so shall it be with us.
- The 1979 edition of the Mormon Church's King James Bible also
supports this statement in note 13a at the bottom of page 1112
of the text of this Bible. It has: "Rev. 11:15, TG [Topical
Guide - notes in the back of the Bible] Jesus Christ, Second Coming
of; Jesus Christ, Son of Man."
|